Post by vanngo on Jul 31, 2015 18:17:43 GMT
1. Why are Faqir Chand’s experiences important in understanding the projective nature of religious visions and miracles?
Faqir Chand’s experience was imperative in understanding the projective nature of religious visions and miracles because he was doing something that no one has ever done before. According to the book, “The Unknowing Sage”, he attempted to induce a consciously near death experience. Near death, experiences are all different to varies people because they unconsciously control what they what to see in their visions. If someone in a near death experience and they believed in Jesus will see Jesus with a white light surrounding him. In the book, there are many more accounts of Faqir Chand’s experiences that support this notion. It is stated in the video “Faqir Chand: Inner Vision and Running Trains”, that Fair Chand was bare the fact that all gurus of whatever stripe were ignorant about the real cause of the miracles and vision attributed with them. What Faqir was trying to illusion was that there is an elusive nature behind several religious visions and miracles. Consequently, Faqir Chand’s experiences are significant to understanding the projective nature of religious visions and miracles because he unveiled the details of the enigmas behind various inner visions and miracles.
2. What is meant by the phrase “philosophy done well is science; philosophy done poorly remains philosophy.” should be at least 150 words. Place your answers on your webs
The phrase “philosophy done well is science; philosophy done poorly remains philosophy” means we can take a theory and run tests to verify it with scientific data and if there is not scientific data to verify the theory then the person doing the study is back to square one. I am a science major and majority of the time what we are learning are facts and there is no disagreeing with facts. The reason is that the theories and hypothesis when tested with science there are varies branches of sciences to support it. When testing the theory with the use of chemistry and the results are false positives, then another branch of science can be used, like physics. On the other hand, philosophy done “poorly” remains philosophy, the theories have gone through varies experiences, but it has led to a dead-end. The theories have many well-written explanations. However, there is no on the universal answer that all the philosophers will agree on. According to the film “The Remainder Conjecture”, the “remainder conjecture” stresses that “we exhaust any and all physical explanation first before succumbing to… the transcendental temptation.” The temptations are resulted in the continuation of a philosophical conjecture, as the product is usually a supernatural explanation.
Faqir Chand’s experience was imperative in understanding the projective nature of religious visions and miracles because he was doing something that no one has ever done before. According to the book, “The Unknowing Sage”, he attempted to induce a consciously near death experience. Near death, experiences are all different to varies people because they unconsciously control what they what to see in their visions. If someone in a near death experience and they believed in Jesus will see Jesus with a white light surrounding him. In the book, there are many more accounts of Faqir Chand’s experiences that support this notion. It is stated in the video “Faqir Chand: Inner Vision and Running Trains”, that Fair Chand was bare the fact that all gurus of whatever stripe were ignorant about the real cause of the miracles and vision attributed with them. What Faqir was trying to illusion was that there is an elusive nature behind several religious visions and miracles. Consequently, Faqir Chand’s experiences are significant to understanding the projective nature of religious visions and miracles because he unveiled the details of the enigmas behind various inner visions and miracles.
2. What is meant by the phrase “philosophy done well is science; philosophy done poorly remains philosophy.” should be at least 150 words. Place your answers on your webs
The phrase “philosophy done well is science; philosophy done poorly remains philosophy” means we can take a theory and run tests to verify it with scientific data and if there is not scientific data to verify the theory then the person doing the study is back to square one. I am a science major and majority of the time what we are learning are facts and there is no disagreeing with facts. The reason is that the theories and hypothesis when tested with science there are varies branches of sciences to support it. When testing the theory with the use of chemistry and the results are false positives, then another branch of science can be used, like physics. On the other hand, philosophy done “poorly” remains philosophy, the theories have gone through varies experiences, but it has led to a dead-end. The theories have many well-written explanations. However, there is no on the universal answer that all the philosophers will agree on. According to the film “The Remainder Conjecture”, the “remainder conjecture” stresses that “we exhaust any and all physical explanation first before succumbing to… the transcendental temptation.” The temptations are resulted in the continuation of a philosophical conjecture, as the product is usually a supernatural explanation.
